Light hits
1. M=33 m=7 A=15
2. M=49 m=15 A=21
3. M=53 m=17 A=27 (occasionally M=67 m=0)
4. M=65 m=21 A=27 (sometimes M=71 m=0)
Medium hits
1. M=41 m=7 A=19
2. M=67 m=19 A=29
3. M=79 m=19 A=57
4. M=81 m=19 A=60?
Hard hits
1. M=27 m=13 A=19
2. M=69 m=27 A=40
3. M=75 m=7 A=60
4. M=67 m=25 A=60
The results were quite mutch varying so not exactly scientefic but I tried my best

. I have just put these things together, this is the first version of the pad and the wiring is temporary etc, so there might be extra error sources, so pls, do not let me be the only one doing this feedback practice...
I also took some oscilloscope photos (see file comments for clarification). When the pad was connected to Megadrum the results were varying more than when disconnected, so that's why also pictures without Megadrum. The waveforms were very stable and looked similar all around the pad. When it was connected to Megadrum there was some variation from hit to hit. These are taken with my 12" tom. I quickly looked also my 10" pad and the results seems to be somewhat similar.
In addition to my messy wiring, the varying input load of the Megadrum _might_ cause some inconsistency to the oscilloscope measurement. I was thinking that if during some part of the waveform the snareH input is read more often by MD then the voltage drops more... and the sharp edges of the "reading pulses" are filtered out by the capacitance of the piezo... don't know just a guess (at least with dc voltage applied to a input the reading interval seems to vary, but DC is totally different case though). The reading interval can perhaps be abnormal due to my inproper settings of the MD parameters also...
_
Kurtsa
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.